Pages Navigation Menu



Photo above: This is what one of the public open houses looked like

Councilor Chuck Bennett says that people paying to park their cars on downtown streets may prove an important way to address serious funding shortfalls.  He’s disappointed that the public and businesses haven’t paid more attention to the work of a Parking Task Force that he and Mayor Anna Peterson have led jointly since last September.   He says responses to the months of study the Task Force has conducted has been “few and far between.”

At the same time, a “parking petition” initiative led by downtown businessperson Carole Smith has received more than 7,000 signatures and is supported by more than 50 downtown businesses.  The petition, which Bennett describes as “ridiculous,” and, “a very bad idea,” suggests charging for parking in Parkades, a very different strategy than the Task Force’s solution to the problem.

Upcoming months will see the two strategies become a more prominent part of Salem public discussion, and may be on a collision course.

“Look,” Bennett says, “what we have downtown doesn’t work.”  He’s concerned that the Downtown Parking District in Salem currently looses $200,000 a year for operations plus $500,000 per year for parking garage maintenance.   He feels that, “if you’re using a parking space, you should pay for it,” likening the concept to the way roads are paid for by drivers when they fill up at the tank and are billed a gas tax.

The recommendations of his Task Force – which Bennett says will be discussed over the next few months by City Council with public input, and then refined with local businesses for the next several years – roughly suggest that the shortfall be addressed by charging for on-street parking, with free parking garages.

The “parking petition” recommends, alternately, that visitors pay $1/day to park in garages, and that street parking be free.  Bennett calls this approach, “wrong-headed, a mistake and a disaster for downtown.”

“What would happen,” he says, is that if the petition became reality, “downtown would quickly fill up with 600-800 state workers who would park there all day for free.  They would be crazy not to.”  This would blockade downtown businesses from their potential customers.
Smith disagrees.  “We had 35 successful years of free unlimited parking, and it was never a problem.  Even at lunch time we only had 75% occupancy, and [parking experts say] you need at least 85% before you put in time limits or meters management tools.”  She says the petition’s recommendation, for $1/day parking in garages, “would double the amount to money they would bring in, so instead of half million in parking permits, the city would bring in $1 million a year.”  The petition may likely be put on the local ballot in May 2014, where it would go to a public vote.

But Bennett insists that free street parking does not solve the problems of businesses.  Citing the many vacant storefronts that now line downtown streets he says. “It’s not as if free parking helps businesses.  Free parking has not resulted in an improved, upgraded downtown.”

Bennett is not sure why the community has not shown more interest in the Task Force or its recommendations.  He says he’s received “almost no comments.  I’ve probably got 5 or 6 emails on the matter from businesses.”  The city has additionally funded several outreach Open Houses, in the conference center and in a downtown storefront, that were sparsely attended.

“This is an attempt to improve downtown,” Bennett says.  “If it’s not right, let’s talk about it.  There is a recommendation now; let’s talk about that recommendation.”
He describes upcoming months as “a really good opportunity… for people to weigh in on the matter in front of Salem City Council.”

If the City Council votes to accept Task Force recommendations later this summer, Bennett anticipates the city will take another 2-3 years to work closely with local businesses to refine the on-street pay parking plan.   It is currently unclear what a May 2014 vote to approve the “parking petition” measure would mean for the Parking Task Force or its recommendations.


  1. I don’t think paid parking meters will help or necessarily hurt downtown business. The businesses don’t have much of anything I want. Cute little boutiques with expensive items that contribute to clutter and clothing that is way too small are just museums to me. Cheap clothing made lightweight so the shipping costs are low that make you have to buy two shirts to equal the weight of one and that are in ugly colors and patterns are not attractive to me. The only reason I go downtown now is to work out at the YMCA and go to coffee with my friends. If I meet a friend for lunch, she usually ends up with a parking ticket because we talk too long so we will probably start using other restaurants. Once every six to 12 months I buy some make-up at Macy’s and once in a couple of years I buy bras at Nordstroms because they give customer service. Occasionally, I buy a gift at Book Bin or French Unicorn but due to postal charges, more and more, I’ve started to use gift cards I purchase at the nearest grocery store. Other reasons I go downtown are to go to events at the Grand Theater or, rarely, to eat dinner so those are after parking meter hours. I don’t like parking garages because I can’t walk very far, especially if I have already spent time scouring the limited number of clothing stores for a long time and finding nothing. I think with the aging of the baby boomers and the rise in disabled parking permits, you might as well forget meters and designate the entire downtown as a disabled parking place. Find some other source to pay for parking resources.

  2. One thing I never hear in these discussions is the huge amount of free parking at the mall, strip malls and big box stores. If we are going to do anything to change the cost of parking downtown we need to reduce the parking minimums in those other areas and start taxing the existing spaces. That would help equalize the costs.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>